08/31/2012

NEXT POST
Google Dominions To take ahead to the promotion of a page Web is a quite complex task and that demand of effort and investment. So that if it owns several dominions, it will have to face the task of promotion of each of them in independent form, trying to offer content of value for the users of original and novel way, and avoiding all coast the content duplicate. It is not difficult to realize that this attempt to neutralize to the competition can be unfavorable, because all these dominions, at heart, compete by the same keywords, and work in branding of the same products. For this reason, before to face an aggressive campaign of purchase of dominions is advisable to raise its long term strategy and to evaluate if truly the investment will result in positive results. Different it is the case when a same company acquires equal dominions but with extensions of different country (.es, .com to.ar, .cl, etc ). This is highly desirable when it is tried to penetrate the local markets. The local dominions tend to be favored in the regional finders. Thus a dominion with extension .es will have one slight advantage in its efforts of positioning in finders before dominions with other extensions. In particular, if the effort is the one to obtain popularity in certain countries, he will be advisable to register a local dominion. Anyway, in this situation, also the prevention to avoid the text is valid duplicate, since in global terms they continue being long-suffering dominions different from being penalized by Google. The natural conclusion is that by each dominion, without concerning the extension, it will be necessary to realise a positioning effort specific Web. If it has liked this post and wants to place it in its site, can do it without disadvantages,...
PREVIOUS POST
Constitutions And Projects An answer to the respected signaller Aurelio Arreaza, with regard to its article " The Constitution is the project of pas" By: Andres Brown Simn Arreche Confieso that the title of the article took a short cut to me. I began to read it and in the second paragraph I already included/understood that it would have to respond, but without the virulence nor " it attacks-al-mensajero" so characteristic of our rojitos compatriots, obnubilados by mandn cuartelario and their conceptual pure gibberish of " bolivariano socialism of the 21st century ". The small letters are deliberately. There returning to the alluded to article, I read some affirmations that not only I do not share, but they are to me paradoxicalally contradictory. Permtanme the Dr. Arreaza and my readers to directly take them from their writing, one after another one, in the same order in whom are expuestan to avoid to descontextualizar them, and to resist them with mine. Only thus, with respect and reasons, we will be able to obtain mutual benefit of our discrepancies. We go to by them: Point N1 " For this ( a country where there is peace. Where the citizen productivity is promoted. The opportunity to create our own businesses and work for others with the guarantee of which our work will be appreciated and protected a country where the wealth is administered well to be able to have the basic things that we love the human beings of the world which we are all essentially equal: house, work, sufficient supply of consumer goods, security, good services, good education ) does not make lack complicate to us with a project of country. To only fulfill the Constitution that already offers the laws so that all we pruned to obtain all the material and spiritual well-being posible."...

Recent Comments