08/13/2016

NEXT POST
Cape Gamow Another fish, the hunter deserves attention - is the mullet. In summer for feeding into the bay Knight comes a lot of this fast and very tasty fish. I must say that hunting of the mullet in the bay Knight is somewhat different from we are used to film the Black Sea hunt. You will not see thousands of schools of fish, for the shooting that you do not even need to be submerged. All a bit more complicated and more interesting. I would divide the hunt for mullet in the bay into two types depending on time of day. Morning and afternoon, especially in sunny weather, mullet actively feeding in the thickets of Zostera at depths ranging from a half to five meters. Fish behave very cautiously. And at the slightest danger darts off with great speed. Clear water is largely complicates the problem. In such circumstances, the strategy works well conceal. The fact that any fish to objects on the surface, is more cautious than the objects lying on the bottom. Recommend that you add to are more goods to neutral buoyancy you had at a half to two meters. Plunging softly and moving slowly among the thickets of Zostera, be prepared to meet any time with nursing the fish. The second method suitable for the evening hunt. By the end of the day the fish stop feeding, going in flocks and migrate to waters of the bay. In this situation, I usually find the right place at the bottom among the separate beams of algae growing at depths of between two and half to four feet and I do haul out, lying face-to-coast. Gun at arm's length body perfectly still. Fish tend to go after one and a half minutes and is followed parallel to the coastline....
PREVIOUS POST
General Procedures This author distinguishes the nature world subjected to forms of the spirit and apriori therefore, subjected to rigorous and rational laws of the Kingdom's history. The world of human activity not subject to laws, but governed by the principle of freedom. Subsequently other philosophers established the historical method exposed mainly by Ricket, who formulated the distinction between nature (everything that exists without the intervention of man) and the best way to study it is the generalized conceptualization. For Ricket to nature it is subordinate to universal facts. Instead the world of culture which is the other side of reality, involves the intervention of man and therefore the appropriate method, historical method characterized by the individualistic conceptualization (does not seek to formulate universal laws, but what is own of every being). This position does not conform to many philosophers and sociologists even formulated by another category (within the methods spiritualists). Thus appears a conception which in addition to formulating the distinction between natural sciences and Sciences of the spirit, States that the object of the natural sciences is the explanation while the object of spiritual science is the understanding. The spiritual Sciences studying the behaviour of a man who pursues a purpose; It says that we can only understand them through intuition, phenomenological method. Its main representative is Husserl. For natural sciences, are science in fact as presented to the experience. Spiritual science are linked to an idea or an act that does know the essence. The method proposed in this author is the essential intuition, that allows you to intuitively capture the essence of the phenomenon and describe it. The authors argue that sociology and other social sciences can not be conceived as one science and that the relationship cause and effect of the natural world, not you can be...

Recent Comments