03/16/2014

NEXT POST
The Civil Procedure Code In the latter, the plurality occurs when the trial has already begun to avail various subjects, by the phenomenon of third party intervention in two ways: joint litigation related counterclaim, accumulation and process domain or third party with better title. The joint litigation extension can be absolute or partial extension, according to the application community outreach to all aspects of litigation, or any of its facets, respectively. In turn, that the Attorney partial extension on community can be with or contradiction in the first case partial extension will be released from any relationship of confrontation. For example, if the insurer to enter the lawsuit in full agreement with the nominations of the insured to the extent of insurance, but not participate in the proceedings as to what level exceeding said. Change the question whether a co-parties show similarities with another while contradictions in other ways, for example, the same insurer that postulates with the same meaning in relation to the amounts and items covered by what the insurer, but disagrees with him as could claim that the first he must answer for the total amount is being sought. 1.4.3. RANKING IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE joint litigation could be: 1 .- Active: Plurality of people as plaintiffs, 2 .- Passive: Plurality of persons as defendants, 3 .- Mixed: When there is plurality of plaintiffs and defendants more persons. The Civil Procedure Code defines as "joint litigation, when two or more persons jointly litigate, as plaintiffs or defendants, which has a same claim, their claims are related or that the sentence issued in respect of a prejudicial to the other.
PREVIOUS POST
High Administration When a crisis comes the first reactions of the High Administration or Managements normally point a: not to invest, reduction of expenses, reduction of personnel, preservative contraction of lines of products and measures. Are these actions the correct ones? The answer will depend on the final mission that persecutes the company that faces a crisis; defining crisis like one of the following: remarkable loss of participation of market, fall of prices, fall in volume of sales, entrance of foreign or but strong competitors, consolidation of a local competitor and/or loss of strong clients. That effect has the measures taken hastily before the crises? We can mention: Definitive loss of the participation of market, loss of credibility before clients and suppliers, loss of important human resource with experience and loss of opportunities of new businesses. But that we do before a crisis? Many we are surprised when somebody says to us, if the market is depressed and his business is in crisis: you must invest. It is an expression that we can resist saying it: He is crazy? He wants that he invests today that I am in crisis to lose more? No, my dear reader. When a market is in crisis not only affects you to him, you affect the rest of competitors, therefore the one that develops the best STRATEGY of Crisis will be the one that survives and gains the market. (The unique exception is if you or the Administration already decided to leave the business). We mention some recommendable alternatives and actions before a crisis: 1. It does not stop investing. Nontenth that invests enough, only that does not have to stop investing. It does not stop renewing the machinery, to update the systems, acquisition of equipment for new products or projects. 2. If Evale is going...

Recent Comments