07/25/2017

NEXT POST
The Philosopher What route the new philosophers must take? The philosophy can be important in such a way for the private scope how much publishes for it? It will be that we must continue to spend efforts conjecturando on the transcendental existence of something or must abandon this pretension and in them to come back toward questions politics arguing ethical and values to be conserved, to stimulate actions directed toward reduction of the suffering of the other, for the language in order to try to understand a little more good the diverse nomenclatures with that we describe our lives, and histories that count on the way covered for our species tie here, with intention to take decisions that not only lead in account in exactly? In relation when linguajar of the philosopher and the ways to display its thoughts, the philosopher must keep its cultured language or must try to come close itself to ' ' povo' '? The philosopher of century XXI must limit it to only write books or can launch hand of resources as the social Internet and its nets? If the philosopher does not run away the contingencies from its time believes that these two you finish questions are pertinent to argue the type of relation and communication that the philosopher of century XXI must have with the members of the society or of the social nets the one that has access. These are some questions that can appear for that they take serious the contemporaries and that already they had lost the hope in the Metaphysical philosophy/. The paper of the philosopher in century XXI still is uncertain, fits to the philosophers at this moment if to strengthen to find a way that if adjusts the contingencies of its time, a way or several that they make...
PREVIOUS POST
Love and Happiness We united if it in a single they would be expressed basic concepts both: the own happiness, the one of the other and the preservation of the individuality. The certain thing is that in thousands of books and songs it is spoken of the love and is hired like the purest emotion, nevertheless end up mixing the concepts of love and desire, which generates erroneous expectations about the same, especially to the new generations. It is important to clarify that the idea of the love not always has to be united to the one of stable pair. Hardly a century ago, the marriage like institution, destined to maintain economic and social an order and to provide a solid familiar frame, did not have anything to do with the love. The rolls to play well were described and delimited. Nobody it called to deceits about which the married success had to be sustained by the magical force of the love. If this occurred, were accidentally addition to the relation but like main factor not to maintain the relation. The love of cuts romantic, that one that refuses to see the defects of the other and to subvalue the difficulties, is not an insuring policy of the stability and own happiness, nor of the pair. The love has to imply respect towards the other and one same one. It must provide an equitable relation. It cannot be a dependency form, and like any other feeling, he is subject of a development process. Its maintenance requires of effort, will and common sense, and why no? , of certain dose of shrewdness, initiative and of the good humor, in order to maintain the illusion and desire alive. Here I arrive, to that I consider, is the most important part of this article: Nothing of...

Recent Comments