The Philosopher

What route the new philosophers must take? The philosophy can be important in such a way for the private scope how much publishes for it? It will be that we must continue to spend efforts conjecturando on the transcendental existence of something or must abandon this pretension and in them to come back toward questions politics arguing ethical and values to be conserved, to stimulate actions directed toward reduction of the suffering of the other, for the language in order to try to understand a little more good the diverse nomenclatures with that we describe our lives, and histories that count on the way covered for our species tie here, with intention to take decisions that not only lead in account in exactly? In relation when linguajar of the philosopher and the ways to display its thoughts, the philosopher must keep its cultured language or must try to come close itself to ' ' povo' '? The philosopher of century XXI must limit it to only write books or can launch hand of resources as the social Internet and its nets? If the philosopher does not run away the contingencies from its time believes that these two you finish questions are pertinent to argue the type of relation and communication that the philosopher of century XXI must have with the members of the society or of the social nets the one that has access. These are some questions that can appear for that they take serious the contemporaries and that already they had lost the hope in the Metaphysical philosophy/. The paper of the philosopher in century XXI still is uncertain, fits to the philosophers at this moment if to strengthen to find a way that if adjusts the contingencies of its time, a way or several that they make possible to the philosophy to have a significant paper in its time, if is that in our time the philosophy still is important. .